Friday, 25 April 2014

NEW: Volume 29.1 released

The Editorial Committee of the Archaeological Review from Cambridge is happy to announce the launch of volume 29.1, April 2014:

Social Network Perspectives in Archaeology

Theme editors: Sarah Evans and Kathrin Felder


Come and join us for a glass of wine on Monday April 28, 2014, 5.30pm, at the MacDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge. Buy this fantastic volume on the day and save the postage! Our diverse collection of back issues will also be for sale, come and browse our great range of topics. We look forward to seeing you there.

Tuesday, 21 January 2014

Call for Papers Issue 30.1

We are pleased to announce the theme for issue 30.1:

Seen and Unseen Spaces
Volume 30.1, April 2015
Theme editors: Mat Dalton (mnd27@cam.ac.uk), Georgie Peters (gp377@cam.ac.uk) and Ana Tavares (at630@cam.ac.uk)

Vision is the element of ancient sensory experience most readily accessible to archaeological methodologies. Monumentality and display, intervisibility, the aesthetics of materials and the provision of light – to name but a few areas of archaeological inquiry explicitly linked to sight – all add to our interpretation of the meaning and use of ancient space, taken here in an inclusive sense to mean both the built environment and the wider landscape.

Equally important is the corollary of not seeing, and recent archaeological studies have rightly emphasized the role of the unseen in shaping past perceptions of space – that which is intentionally or inadvertently hidden or masked, implicitly understood, or even ignored and overlooked. ‘Seeing’, after all, is not just the phenomenon of sight alone, but also the act of meaningful perception.

The visibility or invisibility of space and the people and things it can contain may be closely related to issues such as power and control, identity, privacy, gender and culturally specific ideas of appropriateness at all levels of past human society. A few of the important questions that arise are: how and why are given spaces created, adapted or utilised in order to enhance or negate visibility? What people or institutions are responsible for this shaping of space, and in doing so, who or what has been made more or less visible? Who is intended to see or not see these spaces? At the same time, how are spaces made meaningful through the manifestation of seen elements such as material culture, architecture and the presence and performance of people, or conversely through aspects of the unseen such as memory and the enculturation of social norms? Finally, how do we ensure that contemporary archaeological interpretations of the significance of seen and unseen spaces actually reflect the worldviews and perceptions of the people we study, which most likely differed significantly from our own?

The theme editors welcome papers using any theoretical and methodological approach to address aspects of the seen and unseen in any time period and area of the world. We also encourage contributions working at any scale of archaeological space – from landscape to settlement and house to burial chamber. Possible themes might include (but are not restricted to): 
  • Aspects of privacy, display and control in settlement, mortuary and landscape contexts
  • Archaeological approaches to vision, experience and perception
  • The visualisation and reconstruction of ancient sites and landscapes
  • Interpretations of how space is made meaningful through aspects of the seen and unseen
  • The integration of archaeological-scale data and patterning with human-scale perception
Abstracts of no more than 500 words describing your potential paper should be sent to Mat Dalton (mnd27@cam.ac.uk), Georgie Peters (gp377@cam.ac.uk) and Ana Tavares (at630@cam.ac.uk) by the 14th February 2014. First drafts of papers (of no more than 4000 words) will be due in early June 2014.

The Archaeological Review from Cambridge is a not-for-profit journal managed and published on a voluntary basis by postgraduate archaeology research students at the University of Cambridge. Issues are published twice a year. Although primarily rooted in archaeological theory and practice, the ARC accommodates a wide range of perspectives in the hope of establishing a strong, interdisciplinary journal which will be of interest to those engaged in a range of fields, and therefore breaking down some of the boundaries that exist between disciplines.

Friday, 12 July 2013

Call for Papers Issue 29.2

We are pleased to announce the theme for issue 29.2:


The Archive Issue
Volume 29.2, November 2014
Theme editors: Leanne Philpot (lp303@cam.ac.uk) and Renate Fellinger (rf296@cam.ac.uk)

In past and present cultures, individuals and societies have collected, altered and discarded records of different media, thereby shaping archives. Archives are a fundamental archaeological resource as collections of finds and their associated documentation (such as diaries, reports, drawings, photographs and digital data) not only enable reinterpretation of original assessments but also allow for new research to be carried out. Despite this potential, the study of archives is often overlooked by archaeologists because contemporary understandings of archives tend to be limited in terms of their purposes and what they are supposed to encompass.

Other disciplines including heritage studies and history have recently expanded their focus from traditional concerns such as management procedures. Researchers have started asking more fundamental, theoretical questions about the purpose, use, social context and academic potential of archives, bringing facets such as audience, compilation and access to the forefront of enquiry. Archaeological studies are increasingly adopting these focuses as well as cultivating new approaches and methods for archaeological purposes. The challenge to re-centre archives into the mainstream of archaeological enquiry has led to a reassessment of their uses and the roles they can play in expanding archaeological knowledge.

This ARC issue aims at exploring new approaches and perceptions towards archives in an archaeological context. How has archaeology as a discipline, in both theory and practice, been affected by the reassessment of archives? How can data recovered from archives offer new perspectives on material and quantitative data gathered from fieldwork? In what ways does an increase in archival access for non-experts and new audiences lead to different perspectives on archaeological data? How can socio-political assessments encourage a reflexive approach prompting archaeologists to turn the lens upon their own collecting and archival practices, offering a critical consideration of knowledge production? What can be learnt about the nature and history of archaeology from studying archives as historiographical tools?

We encourage contributions from all disciplines in order to develop an inter- and multi-disciplinary approach towards the archive issue. Possible topics may include but are not restricted to:

  • The theoretical underpinnings of the utility and purpose of archives and their importance to archaeology
  • Archives as a tool of academic enquiry; research, reassessment and reinterpretation of archival records
  • Innovative archival management strategies and developments in governmental and non-governmental guidelines
  • Access and audiences, including Web 2.0 platforms, data sharing and museological access/display
  • Creation, compilation and curation, including reflexive approaches to creation by archaeologists as well as museological/heritage curatorial approaches with regard to knowledge production
  • Historiography and archives; field diaries, reports, production of archaeological knowledge in the past
  • Archives as a social construct; the creation of identities and individual and collective memories and exploring the relationships between archives, their creators and users

Please send an abstract of not more than 500 words to Leanne Philpot (lp303@cam.ac.uk) and Renate Fellinger (rf296@cam.ac.uk) by 16th August 2013. The full article should not exceed 4000 words. The deadline for the first drafts will be 31st October 2013, for publication in November 2014. Style guidelines and notes for contributors can be found at http://www.societies.cam.ac.uk/arc/contribute.html.

The Archaeological Review from Cambridge is a non-profit journal managed and published on a voluntary basis by archaeology postgraduate research students at the University of Cambridge. Issues are released twice a year. Although primarily rooted in archaeological theory and practice, ARC accommodates a wide range of perspectives in the hope of establishing a strong, interdisciplinary journal which will be of interest to those engaged in a range of fields, and therefore breaking down some of the boundaries that exist between disciplines. http://www.societies.cam.ac.uk/arc/

Monday, 4 February 2013

Volume 29.1, April 2014: Call for Papers now open!

Vol. 29.1, April 2014: Social Network Perspectives in Archaeology

Call for Papers

Please send an abstract of no more than 500 words to Sarah Evans and Kathrin Felder (sce25@cam.ac.uk, kaf42@cam.ac.uk) by 15th March 2013.

Tuesday, 2 October 2012

30th Anniversary Party

To celebrate the publication of the very first ARC issue in 1982, the current committee invites former editors, past and future contributors and friends to our 30th Anniversary Party.

Where: Archaeology and Anthropology Museum, Cambridge

When: 19th October, 17.30-20:00

All welcome!

Monday, 25 June 2012

Volume 28.2, Nov 2013: Call for Papers now open

Volume 28.2, November 2013: Humans and Animals

Call for Papers

Please send an abstract of no more than 500 words to Kathryn Boulden and Sarah Musselwhite (kjb66@cam.ac.uk, sjm233@cam.ac.uk) by 31st July 2012.